Method Process Safety
support@methodprosafe.com

Hazard Study Leaders Training Course Testimonials


Spread of delegate scores

70 70
75 75
80 80
85 85
90 90
95 95
100 100
0.0% rated
< 70%
3.1% rated
70 - 75%
0.0% rated
75 - 80%
0.0% rated
80 - 85%
12.5% rated
85 - 90%
43.8% rated
90 - 95%
40.6% rated
95 - 100%

Data taken from last 50 results (max').


Average delegate rating

Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 0.0%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 99.0%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 99.5%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 99.7%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 99.8%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.8%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.2%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.2%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.3%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 96.1%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 93.3%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 93.0%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.2%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.3%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.8%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 96.7%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.0%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 96.7%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.3%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.0%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.9%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.1%
Leeds December 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Leeds December 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.5%
Leeds December 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Leeds December 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Leeds December 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.0%
Handforth July 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Handforth July 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
Handforth July 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 96.3%
Handforth July 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 94.8%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.7%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.3%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.0%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.8%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 80.0%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 82.0%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 86.3%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 87.3%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 87.8%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.2%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.4%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.9%
Manchester March 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Manchester March 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.5%
November 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
November 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%

We asked our delegates what they would say to anyone thinking of attending this course:

"Enjoyed the practical exercises"

"Thoroughly enjoyed the course (against expectations). Would like to get further involved in Hazard Studies."

"Gained confidence in my ability to lead HazOp"

"Good course for the consultant to obtain a substantial understanding the wider picture / interfaces to HazOp."

"I thought the trainer was very good and displayed good knowledge of the subject"

"Highly recommend, made the process more clear"

"Highly recommended"

"I will now be much better at recording actions and making reports more effective"

"This was a very good refresher for me"

"Great course, especially info on how to deal with certain characters in a study workshop."

Hazard Study Workshop Testimonials

E: support@methodprosafe.com. T: 44 (0)1462 713313. W: www.methodprosafe.com

Method Functional Safety

Functional Safety + Process Safety + Cyber Security + Compliance Assessment + Competency Register + Software Solutions = Method Safety and Security

Address: Method Process Safety Ltd. Method House, Davis Crescent, Hitchin, SG5 3RB
Phone: +44 (0)1462 713313 Email: support@methodprosafe.com Website:

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy. Registered In England 11410637 | VAT No. GB 302 4333 56. Site © Copyright Method Process Safety Ltd 2025

LinkedinMethod Functional Safety member of InstMC